sample motion for reconsideration in chapter 11 bankruptcy

#Sample motion for reconsideration in chapter 11 bankruptcy trial

Sale Order The Sale Order shall be entered by the Bankruptcy Court.

FRANCIS R.Related to Bankruptcy Court Approval Motionīankruptcy Court Approval The Bankruptcy Court shall have entered the Sale Order, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, and the implementation, operation or effect of such order shall not be stayed or any stay entered shall have been dissolved.Ĭourt Approval This Agreement is subject to approval of the courts with respect to participating carriers in the hands of receivers or trustees.Īpproval Order The Approval Order shall have been entered by the Bankruptcy Court.

#Sample motion for reconsideration in chapter 11 bankruptcy trial

IV-0018154/4-16-13 NOTICE OF HEARING The Branch Clerk of Court Regional Trial Court Branch 9 GREETINGS: Please be informed that undersigned counsel shall submit the foregoing motion for the consideration and resolution of this honorable court on 08 September 2014 at 10:00 am or at any date convenient to the honorable court. Menlo St., Sulo city By: Francisco Triple IBP NO. TRALALA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW OFFICE OF THE LEGAL AID Counsel for the Plaintiff TRALALA University School of Law Tralala Avenue Cor. Pasay City for Manila City, September 03, 2014. Other reliefs just and equitable under the circumstances are likewise prayed for.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed that this Motion for Reconsideration may be granted and an ordered be issued recalling the warrant of arrest lifting the additional bond and ordering the reinstatement of the case. This motion for reconsideration is not intended to delay the proceedings in this case but filed solely for the reason above-stated. As narrated above accused‟s defense for the Septemhearing was due simply to the fact that neither he or his counsel were notified of the said hearing. The accused respectfully begs that the Honorable Court reconsider its decision last 01 September 2014 and recall the warrant of arrest and lift the order of requiring the accused to file additional bond and to reinstate the case. In the meantime the warrant of arrest against the accused was not lifted. As a result of the accused„s absence in the Septemhearing, this Honorable court again archived the case. Attached hereto and made an integral part hereof as Annex “1” is the Copy of the Marginal Order of the this Honorable Court. In fact, up to this time, accused or his counsel has not received any order or notice of hearing requiring them to attend the hearing held on 01 September 2014. He was informed that there was no written order and there was only Marginal Notes in the left side of the motion submitted by the accused on 18 APRIL 2014. The accused learned the hearing set for Septemon September 2, 2014, or the day after the said hearing, when an intern from the Legal Aid followed up the said case and asked for the copy of the resolution of the Court. Consequently, the accused failed to attend the hearing on September 01, 2011. The order however, was not reduced into writing nor was it sent to the accused. Likewise, this Honorable Court ordered that the accused file an additional bond amounting to Twelve Thousand Pesos (P 12,000.00). On 08 July 2014 this Honorable Court issued an order to revive the case and set the hearing of the same on September 01, 2014.

On 18 April 2014 the Accused filed an “URGENT EXPARTE MOTION TO REVIVE THE ARCHIVED CASE AND LIFT WARRANT OF ARREST WITH PRAYER TO REINSTATE BAIL” and likewise, served the copy of the same to the Honorable Prosecutor Gerardo Sadsad. On 15 April 2014 this Honorable Court issued a warrant of arrest against the accused and ordered that the case be achieved until the warrant of arrest against the accused has been effected. 10-278780 For: Robbery in an inhabited place Juan del Cruz, Accused x-x MANIFESTATION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION The ACCUSED, through the undersigned counsel and to this Honorable Court most respectfully states that: 1. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINESNational Capital Judicial Region REGIONAL TRIAL COURT Branch 09 - Manila PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES Plaintiff, -versus- CRIM.